Start with who controls the page
Every removal case comes down to one question, and it is not what the content says. It is who is hosting it and what makes them act. A mugshot site responds to a state law. A newspaper responds to an editor. Google responds to a policy category or a court order. A review platform responds to its own guidelines. Approach any of them the way you would approach another and you get declined.
So the first thing we do is identify what you are actually dealing with, because the answer determines everything: whether removal is realistic, how long it takes, what it costs, and whether the honest recommendation is to stop trying to delete it and start outranking it instead.
What we remove, and where it usually lands
-
Mugshots and arrest listings
Scraped automatically from jail records and copied across a network of sites. Highly removable, but only if the source listing is dealt with first. Mugshot removal
-
Court records and lawsuits
The court file usually stays. The legal aggregators and background check sites copying it are private businesses, and those come down. Court record removal
-
News coverage
No takedown form, no policy to cite. Corrections, updates and name removal are the realistic outcomes, and syndicated copies are easier than the original. News article removal
-
Reviews and complaint posts
Thirty platforms with thirty different rulebooks. Fake and guideline-breaking reviews come down; genuine complaints usually do not. Review removal
-
Social media content
Platforms act on conduct rather than opinion. Impersonation, doxxing, harassment and intimate imagery have strong routes. Social media removal
-
Search results themselves
Where the page cannot be removed, de-indexing takes it out of Google while leaving it live. Search result removal
The four routes, in the order we try them
-
Removal at the source
The best outcome by a distance, because it solves the problem everywhere at once. The page goes, and with it the search result, the cached copy and anything that would have scraped it later.
-
De-indexing
Where the publisher will not act, the page can sometimes be taken out of search results while staying live. For content nobody finds except through Google, that is nearly as good.
-
Legal escalation
Where material is defamatory rather than unflattering, a court order is the mechanism platforms and search engines respond to. Slower and more expensive, and the right call in a minority of cases.
-
Suppression
When content is accurate, lawfully published and going nowhere, it gets outranked instead. Almost nobody reaches the second page of results, so this achieves most of what deletion would.
What we will tell you before you pay
Good signs for removal
- The content breaches the host’s own published rules
- The poster was not a real customer, patient or client
- Charges were dropped, dismissed or expunged
- The page publishes personal or financial details
- The site is an aggregator rather than the original source
- The same content has been copied to weaker sites
Signs it will need suppression
- The content is accurate and lawfully published
- It is a genuine customer’s honest opinion
- It is an official public record
- It is coverage by a legitimate news outlet
- A platform has already reviewed and upheld it
Most cases contain some of each. A realistic plan usually removes part of the problem and outranks the rest, and you should be told which is which before any money changes hands.
What content removal costs
Quoted per case, once we know what is out there. The variables that actually matter are how many sites are carrying it, whether they are aggregators or original publishers, and whether the route is a removal request, a negotiation or a legal matter.
-
A free audit first
We find everything showing up for your name, not just the link you sent, and tell you what is realistic for each item.
-
Nothing up front
You do not pay to find out where you stand, and on removals you pay once the content is gone.
-
One case, not one per link
The same story on nine sites is quoted as one job, because that is how it has to be worked.
-
Suppression priced separately
Ongoing work is quoted as ongoing work, with a clear picture of what the first page should look like.
Why the order matters more than the effort
The most common mistake we see is somebody who has spent months and a good deal of money removing copies while the original stayed live. Aggregators re-scrape. Every copy taken down came back, because the thing they were all copying from was never dealt with.
Source first, then copies, then the search results, then whatever is left gets outranked. It is not complicated, but doing it in the wrong order turns a finite job into a permanent one.